George W. Bush’s parting gifts to the American people include increased poison for babies
Posted: December 4th, 2008 | Author: karlfrankjr | Filed under: Biology, Culture, Environment, Karl Frank Jr., Nature, Parenting, Politics, Science | Tags: anti-intellectualism, Benjamin Blount, casino, CDC, Democrats, EPA, gay, Georg Bush, intellectual curiousity, neurotoxin, perchlorate, Republicans | Comment Here »Chalk this one up to youthful ignorance. In the year 2000, I was working as a systems analyst for one of the local casinos in St. Louis. One of my co-workers was admittedly gay. Without going too much in to detail, he was very down and dejected after the election. Me, being the smug, politically ignorant, and immature tech guy that I was (and maybe still am) said, “Ah. Don’t worry about it. If he does a bad job, we will just elect someone else in four years. How bad can it be?”
Oh how I have lived to regret those words! I believe that whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, you have to believe that George W. Bush has been a nightmare for America, Americans, and the rest of Earth. He is a prime example of what happens when a society places anti-intellectualism above competence and intellectual curiosity.
So, you have to wonder what his parting gifts to this country will be. Here is one of the worse, and according to this article from Wired, it could take years to reverse.
Feds Set to Eliminate Water Regulations for Neurotoxin | Wired Science from Wired.com
“If you used the human studies from the CDC, then you would be forced to regulate it, because we know there are health effects at current levels of exposure,” said Jacobs.
Benjamin Blount, co-author of the CDC’s study, would not comment on the EPA’s decision, but said that infants — who consume, proportional to their body weight, about six times more water than adults — “are thought to have a higher dose than at any other life stage.”
The EPA declined to comment on why they used a model rather than the CDC’s data in deciding that regulating perchlorate would not provide “a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public water systems.”




















According to Ben Smith’s blog on Politico.com, the Obama ring story is probably not true.

Recent Comments