Posted: March 14th, 2009 | Author: karlfrankjr | Filed under: History, Karl Frank Jr., Politics, Tom Diehl | Tags: History, McSweeney's, moderates, Patrick Henry, slogans | Comment Here »
These are great! Sometimes you just have to be moderate to finalize agreements, but it is hardly ever the moderate that truly sways the hearts and minds of society. Moderates just get the final credit. (Thanks for the heads up Tom Diehl.)
Live free or give me a reasonable alternative!
Peace through pragmatism.
Let’s all keep our opinions to ourselves for a while!
It’s noontime in America.
Some taxation, some representation.
What do we want? Rational discussion? When do we want it? … What works for you?
Hooray for prudence!
We request change in a reasonable amount of time after comprehensive discussion of the options!
Who wants peanuts?
McSweeney’s Internet Tendency: The Lesser-Known Slogans of Political Moderates.
Posted: March 11th, 2009 | Author: karlfrankjr | Filed under: Karl Frank Jr., Technology, Tom Diehl | Tags: RAID, Samsung, Science, ssd, Technology | Comment Here » If you like technology, you’ll love this. Thanks Tom Diehl for sending it.
Posted: December 16th, 2008 | Author: karlfrankjr | Filed under: Karl Frank Jr., Politics, Tom Diehl | Tags: Chris Matthews, Dick Cheney, Frank Gaffney, Iraq, Iraq War, MSNBC | Comment Here » Earlier we had a guest post from Tom Diehl on Dick Cheney’s backpedaling on the reasons for the Iraq War. A moment ago, he sent me this video of Chris Matthews and Frank Gaffney on Hardball.
It gets very personal at the end and Matthews hammers it home:
Posted: December 16th, 2008 | Author: tomdiehl | Filed under: Politics, Tom Diehl | Tags: Al-Qaeda, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Iraq, Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, United States, Weapon of mass destruction | 1 Comment »
In an interview with ABC News, Vice President Dick Cheney said:
“As I look at the intelligence with respect to Iraq, what they got wrong was that there weren’t any stockpiles. What they found was that Saddam Hussein still had the capability to produce weapons of mass destruction. He had the technology, he had the people, he had the basic feed stock.”
Using Cheney’s rationale, we should have invaded Canada, Brazil, the European Union, Japan, China, Russia, and most other industrialized nations. With the no-fly zones, Saddam Hussein had no means to deliver any weapons that could harm the United States. We’ve spent 900 billion dollars occupying a country that was no threat to us and have emboldened our enemies and inspired thousands of Jihadists to join the movement to destroy civilized society and wreak havoc on the world’s economy.
On the flip side, the Bush Administration ignored the warnings of Osama bin Laden; and then obligingly fell into his trap, straining our military capability; causing a spike in oil prices that bin Laden knew would come from a protracted fight in the Middle East, further enriching people who finance al-Qaeda.
Now, what was so important that we had to elect George W. Bush and Dick Cheney twice?
January 20, 2009 cannot come soon enough.
Recent Comments